Testing a fake 128GB Samsung EVO+ micro SD card
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3bec/a3bec15a9a49f883606c0dc9e9434b87467fac16" alt=""
My phone and laptop both reported full 128GB of space. Interestingly, the case contained the regular disclaimer that 1GB = 1000,000,000 bytes, but presumably in an attempt to avoid suspicion the card reported a full 128GB of space (using 1024^3 = 1GB). I tested it by copying some files to it and immediately had problems. The transfer rate was abysmal, between 1 and 2 MB/s, nothing close to the advertised rate on the package. And Windows kept on saying the card wasn't inserted, or needed to be checked for errors. After checking for errors some of the files were missing. I figured maybe the first part of the disk was bad, corrupting the FAT file system data, so I partitioned the disk in two, starting with a dummy 8mb partition.
The dummy partition helped. The write speed of the disk went up to about 5MB/s and Windows stopped reporting damage to the file system.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5936/d59363eaa01dbf152b47b09b527a5fbf23fd3eb4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2356b/2356b11c8c875bc2c84d087c9bfae1c2e5c1f931" alt=""
I suppose I could use it to store my MP3 collection for playing back on a old phone. Time will tell if the usable storage remains usable long enough to make even that worthwhile.
Final note: that SD card adapter was so cheap that it failed after just a couple insertion/removal cycles. See the crack in the lower left corner. Thus, all my tests were conducted with a genuine Samsung adapter.
Comments